<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New TTAC site design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ben-huddleston.com/news/new-ttac-site-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ben-huddleston.com/news/new-ttac-site-design/</link>
	<description>Website of Ben Huddleston - right now it's mainly a playground for testing Wordpress plugins.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:46:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cole</title>
		<link>http://www.ben-huddleston.com/news/new-ttac-site-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1762</link>
		<dc:creator>cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 20:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redwingstudio.com/2007/05/23/new-ttac-site-design/#comment-1762</guid>
		<description>better then than now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>better then than now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.ben-huddleston.com/news/new-ttac-site-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redwingstudio.com/2007/05/23/new-ttac-site-design/#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>Point - Counterpoint.
I&#039;ll open the debate from an advertising perspective....
1/3 down the screen is the ideal real estate for advertising. Think grocery store - all the expensive cereal is eye level. Now that said, we fervently agree that the priority should be given to aesthetics over advertising - unless it&#039;s at the expense of advertising, taxes and mortgage, taxes and mortgage.
Oh, and y&#039;all on 800x600, you&#039;re going to have to upgrade soon. You&#039;re down to 5% of the market, just give in and let that ole screen rez go the way of the dinosaur. Personally I&#039;m at 1920x1200 - I can&#039;t remember the last time a site went all the way across my screen. Granted I&#039;m squinting like a bat in the desert, but at least I can watch television, IM, and blog without going to a second monitor (that&#039;s for email :) )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point &#8211; Counterpoint.<br />
I&#8217;ll open the debate from an advertising perspective&#8230;.<br />
1/3 down the screen is the ideal real estate for advertising. Think grocery store &#8211; all the expensive cereal is eye level. Now that said, we fervently agree that the priority should be given to aesthetics over advertising &#8211; unless it&#8217;s at the expense of advertising, taxes and mortgage, taxes and mortgage.<br />
Oh, and y&#8217;all on 800&#215;600, you&#8217;re going to have to upgrade soon. You&#8217;re down to 5% of the market, just give in and let that ole screen rez go the way of the dinosaur. Personally I&#8217;m at 1920&#215;1200 &#8211; I can&#8217;t remember the last time a site went all the way across my screen. Granted I&#8217;m squinting like a bat in the desert, but at least I can watch television, IM, and blog without going to a second monitor (that&#8217;s for email <img src='http://www.ben-huddleston.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

